Monday, November 30, 2015

Film Critique - Cairo Time

Sarah Khalil
Humanities 101
Professor Bomboy
November 20, 2015
            I have chosen to analyze and critique the movie Cairo Time written and directed by Ruba Nadda. I chose to critique the way the music in the film is used to heighten emotional response.
            The film Cairo Time is simply about a terse romantic connection between two people that cannot be together. The film basically shows the West meeting the East for the first time and exploring more about each other’s beliefs and cultures. It illustrates that in the Western culture, people are constantly busy, accomplishing deadlines and never having a chance to slow down and think. However, when the American woman arrives to the East she is forced to slow down and think more about her life. I believe the intent of the film is to show viewers that two people from different cultures can have an unexpected love affair despite their cultural and religious differences. Since the film was actually shot in Egypt, I believe its other intent is to show people the beauty of Egypt and its people.
            The movie consists of two main characters, Juliette Grant and Tareq Khalifa and it takes place the same year the movie was produced. There are other important characters such as Kathryn and Mark.
 Many know that music portrays a wide range of emotions. Music is powerful in that sense and because of that Ruba Nadda does an excellent job of incorporating the right music in the right scenes. More than 90% of the music used in Cairo Time is instrumental and/or classical music. Most of the music used has a soft yet intriguing rhythm. I believe Ruba Nadda did this because the movie is a slow paced romantic movie and she wants the audience to pay attention to what the characters are saying to one another and their facial expressions rather than paying attention to the words of a song.
Ruba Nadda only incorporated two Egyptian songs in the movie and I believe she did so to make the audience feel like they’re actually in Egypt. The song “Ahwak” by Abdel Halim Hafez (a popular classic in Egypt) was played when Tarek took out Juliette for a walk. Ahwak in Arabic means “I love you”. I don’t believe Tarek loved Juliette just yet but Nadda played this song to show that he was in fact falling in love with her slowly without realizing it.
When Juliette goes to the White Desert (a small town in Western Egypt) with her friend, Kathryn, the instrumental song “White Desert” by Niall Byrne is played in the background and sets a sorrowful yet mellow mood. I believe this is one of the most important scenes in the movie because Kathryn is telling Juliette how she once fell in love with an Egyptian man and almost left her husband for him. Kathryn then tells Juliette “You seem happy. That’s all that matters” (Iron & Nadda, 2009). When in fact the audience can see Juliette looking out into the distance thinking if she truly is happy or is just lying to herself to keep her marriage alive.
Tarek was a former bodyguard to Mark (Juliette’s husband) and due to this Tarek is asked by Mark to show her around the city until he returns from the UN. In the beginning of the movie, Tarek asks Juliette if she’d like to see the pyramids but she politely declines and says she can’t because she made a promise to Mark that they would see the pyramids together. However, towards the very end of the movie, the instrumental song “Cairo Time” by Niall Byrne sets a calm and romantic mood and is played when Juliette agrees to see the pyramids with Tarek. This shows the audience that she is slowly falling in love with Tarek and slowly forgetting about her husband. During this scene no words are exchanged, just facial expressions.
As soon as Juliette and Tarek arrive at the hotel after seeing the pyramids together, Mark arrives, thanks Tarek for everything and takes Juliette to the pyramids. As they’re in the taxi on their way to the pyramids, “Till I kissed you” by The Everly Brothers on the radio starts playing. I believe the Nadda incorporated this song into the scene because Juliette and Mark are almost leaving Egypt and heading back home to America. The reality for Juliette starts to set in and she starts to sob for a moment quietly.
Overall, I believe Nadda did a superb job of delivering her message to the audience. I believe there are several different messages from Cairo Time. But I believe the main one is that the choices you make in life determine your fate. All of the choices that Juliette made in her life lead up to one important moment, meeting and falling in love with Tarek. I also believe that Patricia Clarkson (Juliette) and Alexander Siddig (Tarek) were perfect actors for the film. Not because they delivered the lines correctly but because of the facial expressions they expressed in the movie. When I first watched the movie I kept forgetting it was a movie because of how realistic the actors made it out to be. This movie actually encouraged me to look more into the whole soundtrack of the movie because it was very touching, heartwarming and nostalgic. Although the music used was very quiet and calm, I believe Nadda has attracted many towards her movie due to the music she chose to incorporate.



Works Cited
Cairo Time. By Ruba Nadda. Perf. Patricia Clarkson and Alexander Siddig. IMDb, 2009. DVD.

Iron, Daniel, prod. Cairo Time. Screenplay by Ruba Nadda. Dir. Ruba Nadda. IFC Films, 2009.   
          Film

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Feminism within Art

Sarah Khalil
November 04, 2015
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
Feminism within Art
            Throughout the years different viewpoints and movements have been expressed through art. To some, art is merely an aesthetic. While to others, it is a way to express ones emotions, beliefs and even experiences. Similarly to storytelling, art is just the same. Art is a way to narrate a story through details, elements of art, and principles of design. One artist who has expressed feminism vividly through her artworks is Artemisia Gentileschi. “Judith Slaying Holofernes” is one of her famous artworks that was completed between 1614-1620 (Fiero 48). “Judith Slaying Holofernes” is a narrative painting that not only reveals her viewpoints of society, but more importantly her viewpoints of feminism. In fact, this famous artwork is known to be linked to a real-life experience that Gentileschi had experienced.
            Like any artwork, “Judith Slaying Holofernes” has many elements of art and principles of designs incorporated into it. “Judith Slaying Holofernes” is an oil on canvas type of painting that shows two women, one resembles to be Judith and the other resembles to be a maid. There’s also a man who seems to be Holofernes in the painting on a bed outstretched with Judith standing above him and striking his neck with his own sword. The maid is aiding Judith to hold down Holofernes while Judith is portrayed as barely using any strength and still managing to cut off Holofernes’s head. This painting is famous mainly because it is a biblical story and is expressed through a feminist viewpoint (Fiero 48). It is seen to be expressed in a feminist viewpoint because Judith and the maid are both shown with their sleeves rolled up and working in unison to resemble that women who work together are focused and strong women. This shows the viewer that Gentileschi thinks of women as strong, independent and powerful. Whereas, painter Caravaggio’s “Judith Slaying Holofernes” painting resembles a very small and petite woman with a surprised expression on her face while slaying Holofernes with an old lady behind her that seems to be the maid assisting her. Caravaggio’s painting also shows creases on Judith’s wrist implying that physical strength is required for her to cut off Holofernes head. This shows the viewer that Caravaggio thinks of women as tiny, feminine, and possibly even weak.
The use of lines in this painting is phenomenal because it shows every little detail ranging from the bedsheets and clothing to the blood escaping Holofernes neck. All of which resemble the painting to seem more vivid. Since Gentileschi is a woman, her paintings resemble realistic shapes of a woman figure as opposed to male painters who paint unrealistic or idealistic women figures. Not only that but the painting itself has many organic/natural shapes incorporated into it. All of which make the painting seem more realistic and 3-D. Another thing that makes the painting appear as natural looking is the color scheme. Many of the colors used are natural-like colors, such as red, white, brown, black, etc. The overall texture of the painting is very realistic to the point where it seems as if the painting is an actual photograph. The texture of the clothes resemble the wrinkles, the blood from Holofernes neck isn’t dramatic but is seemingly more realistic looking, and the bedsheets and mattress have similar textures as one would see in real life. The use of value is incorporated evenly in this painting, because Gentileschi uses shadows in the correct places to make the painting seem more 3-D. Such as the complete black background behind Judith and the maid to resemble that Judith is killing Holofernes during the nighttime. When it comes to space, the painting seems almost crowded but not too crowded for anyone to miss any details. Gentileschi does this to make it seem as if the viewers are in the painting with Judith in the tent. The obvious form of the painting is to give the illusion that it is 3-D and more than just a painting. It seems as if Gentileschi wants the viewer to experience what Holofernes is going through and by doing so she gives the painting realistic forms and qualities.
The elements of art and principles of design go hand in hand in any artwork because the principles of design are merely to rearrange the elements of art. In this painting, contrast is found in the organic shapes as on the characters in the painting. For example, there is a contrast between dark colors and the characters in the painting such as the pitch black background and the light being focused more on the characters. Gentileschi does this because she wants the viewers to focus on the characters, which is why the detail itself isn’t very detailed but instead simple yet informative. This is also seen with proportion, since proportion can resemble how much color one thing holds as opposed to something else. The only things that hold color in the painting are the characters clothing, the characters, and the bed containing Holofernes. The whole emphasis on this painting is Holofernes head. This is because Judith’s goal is primarily to kill Holofernes and to cut off his head. This act resembles power and being in control. This whole painting from Gentileschi’s point of view is to resemble that women are always in power and should never be underestimated. Since rhythm is defined as ones eye bouncing from “like” object to “like” object, in this painting Gentileschi wants the viewer to look at Holofernes (since he is the focal point), then to Judith and then to the maid. There isn’t much repetition going on in the painting other than the repetition of natural colors and organic shapes being used continuously, which ultimately leads to unity. Everything in this painting resembles unity because everything matches and everything is well put together in a delicate and simple way. There is unity in the way colors and lines are used to bring this painting all together. Gentileschi’s use of elements and principles come together in unity to bring the painting to life. Every little element and principles were used strategically to pull the viewer into the painting. Gentileschi doesn’t want a viewer to look away from this painting until they have understood every little aspect of it and she does this by pulling the viewer into the painting. The lines, shapes, colors, and textures in the painting create a serious mood. Whereas, the value, space and form display control and power. On the other hand, the principles of design are what truly give the illusion that this painting is a carbon copy of a “photograph”.
Although “Judith Slaying Holofernes” is a biblical story, Gentileschi also incorporated her own meaning into her painting of “Judith Slaying Holofernes”. During the 1600’s and many other eras, women were constantly viewed as people who were merely created to cook, clean, serve and give birth. Due to this corrupted viewpoint it allowed many men to take advantage of women and get away with it. Unfortunately, Gentileschi was one woman who was taken advantage of by her art teacher Agostino Tassi. Tassi was a convicted rapist who had previously served time for raping his previous wife and his sister-in-law. In 1612, a trial was held of Tassi being charged and convicted of raping Gentileschi. During the 16th century, when a woman accused a man of raping her, she was put under torture in order to force the woman to lie and say that she wasn’t raped and to prove that women are merely delusional. During the trial, Gentileschi was tortured with thumbscrews and other methods of torture to “prove” that she wasn’t lying (Garrard and Steinem). However, through the course of this torture, whenever she was asked if she was raped, Gentileschi never gave up and continued to state that she was in fact raped by Tassi (Garrard and Steinem).
The biblical story behind “Judith Slaying Holofernes” tells a story of the assassination of the Assyrian general Holofernes committed by the Israeli, Judith. Judith assassinated Holofernes because Holofernes was trying to take advantage of her and waiting for an opportunity to seduce her (Fiero 48). The interpretation of “Judith Slaying Holofernes” by Gentileschi is to show that women are just as powerful and have the ability to triumph over powerful men. Gentileschi drew herself as Judith and drew her rapist, Agostino Tassi, as Holofernes. Overall, I believe that Gentileschi has accomplished the idea of being a feminist figure to other women by encouraging other women to speak up and to defend themselves no matter what the situation may be. Gentileschi did this by never giving up during her rape trial, no matter how much torture she had gone through. I believe the aim Gentileschi was going for was simply a cathartic expression of her traumatic experience(s). Not only was she a rape victim, but she had to prove to the court that Tassi was her abuser. One can only imagine how much anger, rage and disappointment that Gentileschi was feeling at the time when she had no one on her side. As I stated earlier, art is a way of expressing ones emotions and Gentileschi used art to her advantage to express her emotions since she could barely write at the time (Garrard and Steinem). The key that motivated Gentileschi to paint “Judith Slaying Holofernes” was merely her traumatic rape trial/experience. It is often seen that people who experience life-changing calamities are the ones that express their pain through art, writing, and poetry all in a tragic yet exquisite manner. For example, Vincent Van Gogh suffered with depression and committed suicide but left the world with many aesthetically pleasing paintings behind.
From my perspective, I truly believe that Gentileschi communicated the idea she was trying for; which is, feminism. When I first saw this painting, I had no background knowledge of Gentileschi but I still knew that the meaning behind “Judith Slaying Holofernes” is that women are powerful, independent and don’t need to rely on men. From my viewpoint, this painting empowers women and reminds society that not all women are designed to be “lady-like” or “feminine”. This painting also shows that women are equal to men and just as capable to doing anything a man can do. This painting makes me feel confident and powerful and it gives me a sense of “You can do anything if you put your mind and strength to it”. Before I saw Gentileschi’s painting of “Judith Slaying Holofernes” I never thought of myself as a feminist. Mainly because I’ve seen many extreme feminists and it discouraged me to support feminism. But after looking into Gentileschi’s life, I realized that feminism only means one thing, and that is equality. From a feminist viewpoint, Gentileschi only wanted to be treated with respect and equality. It is obvious that through her painting(s), Gentileschi treats/views women as queens with control and power. I believe that Gentileschi was a forward-thinking artist and because of this she believed that one day women would receive the rights they deserve. During the 1600, women were constantly being underestimated and viewed as incompetent and weak. Although, from a Marxist viewpoint, Gentileschi portrays power in women. For example, advertisements display subtle hints or messages that the subconscious mind picks up and processes later on unintentionally. Nowadays, the “ideal” woman is portrayed to be Kim Kardashian and because of this many women try to imitate her looks; some even imitate her looks without even realizing it. The same thing goes towards Gentileschi’s painting of “Judith Slaying Holofernes” because Gentileschi is trying to send the message that women are just as powerful. By doing this it could even cause some men to become intimidated by the painting or even by certain women. Overall, Gentileschi’s painting of “Judith Slaying Holofernes” has a deeper meaning and holds a feminist viewpoint that many overlook. Although, Artemisia Gentileschi is no longer around, her paintings still prosper.


“Judith Slaying Holofernes” by Artemisia Gentileschi. 1614-1620. Oil on canvas.









  
“Judith Beheading Holofernes” by Caravaggio. 1598-1599. Oil on canvas.







Works Cited
Camara, Esperança. "Khan Academy." Khan Academy. Khan Academy, n.d. Web. 05 Nov.         
2015.
Fiero, Gloria K. The Humanistic Tradition. 7th ed. Vol 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2015. Print.

Garrard, Mary, and Gloria Steinem. "ON ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI." ON ARTEMISIA             GENTILESCHI. Members.efn, n.d. Web. 04 Nov. 2015